Back to Blogs

What Is "The State"? (And Why It Dictates Your Fundamental Rights)

27 July 2026JurisVita
Article 12Indian ConstitutionDefinition of StateFundamental RightsIndian LawConstitutional LawPart III ConstitutionSupreme Court of IndiaAjay Hasia CaseLegal KnowledgeUPSC

What Is "The State"? (And Why It Dictates Your Fundamental Rights)

Ever wondered who actually has to respect your Fundamental Rights in India?

We all know we have rights like freedom of speech, equality before the law, and protection from discrimination. But here is the catch: if a private company fires you unfairly, you can’t run to the Supreme Court claiming a violation of your Fundamental Rights. Why? Because those rights are primarily built as a shield against power wielded by the government.

That brings us to Article 12 of the Indian Constitution—a small, four-line provision sitting right at the front of Part III that quietly controls everything else.

The Core Question Article 12 Answers

Before the Constitution hands you your rights (Articles 14 through 35), Article 12 defines a single key term: "The State."

Why does this definition matter so much? Because if an organization isn't legally considered "the State," you generally can't file a direct writ petition in the Supreme Court (under Article 32) or a High Court (under Article 226) against them for violating your Fundamental Rights.

Article 12 says "the State" includes:

1.      The Union Government & Parliament (Executive and Legislative branches at the national level)

2.      State Governments & Legislatures (Executive and Legislative branches in every state)

3.      Local Authorities (Municipalities, Panchayats, District Boards, Town Trusts)

4.      Other Authorities within India or under the control of the Government.

The first three make total sense. But that last phrase—"Other Authorities"—is where all the real drama happens.

The Big Legal Dilemma: What Counts as an "Other Authority"?

Back in 1950, "the State" mostly meant police, tax collectors, and civil servants. But as India grew, the government started creating all kinds of entities—public sector enterprises, statutory corporations, research councils, and autonomous bodies.

This created a major loop hole: Could the government just delegate its work to a company or board, and suddenly be free from respecting fundamental rights?

The Supreme Court stepped in to say no. Over the decades, judges shifted the focus from what an organization is named to how much power and backing the government actually gives it.

The Turnaround: Ajay Hasia (1981)

To stop the confusion, the Supreme Court laid down six practical checkpoints. An organization is almost certainly "the State" if:

·         The government funds it completely (holds almost all the capital).

·         The government pays for its day-to-day operations.

·         It holds a monopoly protected or created by the government.

·         The government holds deep, pervasive control over its management.

·         It performs a public function closely tied to governmental duties.

·         It was created by transferring a government department into a corporation.

You don't need to check every single box. If the overall picture shows the government pulling the strings, it counts as an arm of the State.

So, Who’s In and Who’s Out?

Courts have weighed in on dozens of institutions over the years. Here’s a quick snapshot:

·         YES (Counts as "State"):

o    Public Sector Banks, LIC, ONGC, SAIL, BHEL, and State Electricity Boards.

o    CSIR (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research).

o    Statutory bodies like the UGC or NCERT (depending on context).

·         NO (Does NOT count as "State"):

o    BCCI (Zeev Telefilms, 2005) — Even though it runs cricket for the nation, the government doesn't directly finance or control its day-to-day operations.

o    Private companies, un-aided private schools, and independent NGOs.

Why Article 12 Is Even More Important Today

As India leans heavily into privatization, public-private partnerships (PPPs), and third-party tech platforms handling public services, the boundary of Article 12 is shifting fast.

If an algorithm managed by a private vendor decides who gets government benefits, is that vendor acting as "the State"?

Article 12 is the ultimate reminder that power requires accountability. As long as government control exists in a process, the Constitution ensures citizens have a way to stand up and fight back.